It's safe to say that, basically, with any Mac you buy, you can edit video. So let's look at some of the models offered that are conducive to video editing and post.

13' or 15' macbook pro retina for travelling/video editing? I'm planning to buy a new macbook pro retina with 16 gb ram and i7 processor. I just can't decide between the 13' or 15'. I want something portable for travelling.so I lean toward the 13', but I'm concerned the screen will be too small to comfortably edit video in Final Cut Pro and After Effects. However, most 'serious' editing will be done at home on my iMac and the macbook pro would be more for browsing, movie watching and storage when travelling and maybe a bit of basic video shortlisting. BUT.I also feel why spend so much on a 13' when for a bit more I could have everything with a 15' (except the portability).

Best apps for mac 2018. Top 10 Task Managers for Mac #1. GoodTask 3 is a fully featured task or project manager for Mac. The app syncs with the default Reminders and Calendars to let you manage them with ease. You can quickly edit your tasks thanks to the bulk editing and deleting features.

I know the 15' is still portable but I'd be less likely to pop it in my handbag in case I come across an internet cafe. I'd love to hear from people with experience editing video on a 13' retina display and to know if you think it's adequate. Thanks • Asked by fn from Lennox Head • 10 23, 13. Best Answer: Hi (i've only just read your post so you've probably solved your question by now, but for what it's worth.) I shoot and edit for a living and use a 2011 13' MBP (non-retina) with an i5 processor and 8GB ram. I find it fine for FCP6 and FCPX editing, and occasional Motion work. Admittedly the screen is small but full-screen playback mode is plenty big enough for the client to view.

The 15' isn't drastically bigger so there isn't much visual benefit. The main advantage with the 15' are the beefed-up graphics options, which are only necessary if you're going to grade and add multiple effects, since it'll cut down on render times etc.

All in all the basic 13' is a deceptively powerful little beast that'll chew through broadcast-quality, full HD for hours on end without faltering, even with a second screen attached. I can only assume the Retina versions are even faster? If portability is an issue: several of my clients use FCPX on a Macbook Air! And it seems to run really well as long as you don't go overboard with effects etc. It's worth a look if you know anyone who has a new Air and are happy for you to tinker with it? For all options you'll need external, fast storage so you don't clog your system. This is only my opinion, based on experience.

I'm sure other people will have some valuable input too. • Answered by Mark L • 03 22, 14.

This week, Apple finally admitted, after too damn long, that it had overdesigned the 'trash can' Mac Pro into a corner. Its triangular thermal design was innovative but impossible to upgrade, and failed to anticipate shifts in computing following its launch. After several years of silence, the company finally apologized, admitting that a. Apple has now heavily discounted the as an act of contrition, but is that enough for Pro users to bite? Dan Cooper is tempted to make the splash, but Aaron Souppouris is desperate to stop him. Daniel Cooper, Senior Editor I've been using a base-model for nearly five years, and it's been showing its age for a while.