15.01.2019

Operating Systems: Windows 2000/XP/Vista/7 - 57 MB ; 2.MyFinePix Studio Ver.4.2b For Windows 8 / 7 / Vista / XP; 3.FinePixViewer Ver.3.6 Updater for Mac OS.

My Finepix Studio For MacDownload myfinepix studio for mac

Edward Rauschkolb wrote: Hi, I just received my XE-1 kit and was going to install the software, but noted that it is only good for Mac OSX 10.5 or 10.6. As I am running Lion (10.7.5), there appears to be no software available for Mac. I also use a 4/3 system (E5/E1 + lenses), micro 4/3 (OMD + lenses) and Leica M9P and manage all of the files on my iMac with PS/LR I am aware that PS/LR/Aperture really do not support raw processing for the Fuji sensor, so now am I only limited to using the camera body itself as a processing engine. While I do not love raw processing, I would like the opportunity to both raw process and to use the Fuji Film simulations OOC (out of camera). This is especially true considering the rather poor rear screen on the XE-1. I do maintain a Win7 virtual machine (VMWare Fusion) to run various programs that run only on Windows.

These are largely old programs (WordPerfect, etc) and I would rather not go this route. Is there really no software provided by Fuji that will run on OSX 10.7 or 10.8. Am I missing something here?

I love the feel and images from the camera, but this appears to not make a lot of sense. Version 69.0.3497.81. Thanx in advance, Ed The version of Raw file converter EX for the Fujifilm X-Pro 1 I am using is 3.2.9.1 and it does work on Mac OSX 10.8.2 (which has no Rosetta). I suspect but do not know that it will also work with the XE-1, and I'm sure they will also have a download for that. You can download it from.

Braeside wrote: The version of Raw file converter EX for the Fujifilm X-Pro 1 I am using is 3.2.9.1 and it does work on Mac OSX 10.8.2 (which has no Rosetta). I suspect but do not know that it will also work with the XE-1, and I'm sure they will also have a download for that. You can download it from May not work with the xe1. There are differences between the xe1 and xp1 raw file structures. I downloaded some xe1 raw files and tried version 3.2.9.1 of the xp1 converter.

It would not open the files. Upgrade video card drivers for mac. Could have been the files were renamed (though not apparent). Worth a try though, easy enough.

ThreeOh wrote: braeside wrote: The version of Raw file converter EX for the Fujifilm X-Pro 1 I am using is 3.2.9.1 and it does work on Mac OSX 10.8.2 (which has no Rosetta). I suspect but do not know that it will also work with the XE-1, and I'm sure they will also have a download for that. You can download it from May not work with the xe1. There are differences between the xe1 and xp1 raw file structures. I downloaded some xe1 raw files and tried version 3.2.9.1 of the xp1 converter. It would not open the files. Could have been the files were renamed (though not apparent).

Worth a try though, easy enough. You are correct it does not work with XE-1 raw files Sorry for the false hope. What software comes on the CD with the XE-1? Does it have a version of Raw file converter and does it install on OS X 10.7 & 10.8? Derek Dean wrote: The Silver Fox wrote: Derek Dean wrote: So, I just got off the phone with Fuji Pro Digital help center, and they couldn't give me any kind of help at all. The young lady was very nice, but explained that for some reason the Pro-1 and X-E1 'don't seem to play well with Mac computers', that they have problems with updates, etc, and she wasn't sure when support would be forthcoming. Well, as a Mac user, this pretty much settles it for me.

I've been waiting to decide between purchasing the X-E1 & the Oly OM-D. With the dodgy RAW support for the Fuji X-cameras (except the X-100, which I own and love), and this revelation that they don't play well with Macs, with no timeline for when support will arrive, I'm going with the OM-D. The X-E1 is the superior of the OM-d in so many ways. But as with many of Fuji's products, it seems to have a small number of crippling flaws that prevent it from being universally acceptable. Well, I know exactly how you feel, but I'm still considering the X-E1.

What's funny is that it lacks so many of the features I would love to have in a new system, like a fully articulating LCD, touch screen, WYSIWYG in full manual mode, a few more Function buttons, full RAW support, a better video section, etc. But I believe it has that one thing that probably trumps all those convenience features. Amazing image quality.